BY Howie Stalwick 01:38PM 09/07/2014

0-2 Cougars’ Leach quickly on the hot seat

Unexpected defeats leave Cougars suddenly on the edge of a seasonal disaster. Leach needs a miracle or two to restore his credibility.

The unexpected 0-2 start has put coach Mike Leach on the spot./ Gary Breedlove, Sportspress Northwest

Watching Mike Leach and his coaching staff rebuild the Washington State football program is not unlike watching a toddler learn to walk. You know: One step forward, two steps backward, one step forward, splat!

A little perspective may be order, given the Cougars’ surprising – nay, shocking – 0-2 start. Yes, there are plenty of negatives to be spewed, but just as many positives. Honest. In fact, we can think of at least 10 of each.

Positive No. 1: WSU is averaging 430.5 passing yards per game.

Negative No. 1: WSU is averaging 22 rushing yards per game.

Positive No. 2: The Cougars have gained more total yards than each of their opponents.

Negative No. 2: The Cougars had more turnovers, penalties, sacks allowed and field goals missed than each of their opponents.

Positive No. 3: Since giving up a 78-yard touchdown pass on the first play from scrimmage in the season opener against Rutgers, the Cougars have yielded only 313 passing yards.

Negative No. 3: Each WSU opponent has rushed for more yards on one play (56 by Rutgers, 55 by Nevada) than the Cougars have rushed for in both games combined (44).

Positive No. 4: Coach Mike Leach, two games into his third season at WSU, has won as many games (nine) as predecessor Paul Wulff won in four years.

Negative No. 4: Leach (9-18) has already made about as much money as Wulff (9-40) made on his five-year contract. Leach makes $2.75 million a year; Wulff made $3 million total — $600,000 per year –  counting one season after his firing.

Positive No. 5: Leach won more conference games (five) in his first two seasons than Wulff won (four) in his four seasons.

Negative No. 5: Among the 32 head football coaches in WSU history, only Wulff (.184) and Jim Sweeney (.306) have lower overall winning percentages than Leach (.333).

Positive No. 6: The Cougars have given up 27 or fewer points seven times in the past 14 games.

Negative No. 6: The Cougars have given up 41 or more points six times in the past 11 games.

Positive No. 7: WSU’s first game at Martin Stadium is next Saturday against Portland State, a Big Sky Conference team.

Negative No. 7: The Cougars are 12-20 at Martin Stadium since 2008.

Positive No. 8: WSU is 17-0 against current Big Sky Conference teams since losing at home to Montana in 1947.

Negative No. 8: The Cougars were 2-0 all-time against Nevada – winning 31-7 in Seattle in 2002 and 55-21 in Reno – before Friday’s loss in Reno.

Positive No. 9: The last time the Cougars started 0-2, they defeated Southern Methodist in the third game of the 2009 season.

Negative No. 9: The 2009 Cougars lost their remaining nine games by an average score of 45-10.

Positive No. 10: Washington State returns a solid core from last season, when the Cougars made their first bowl appearance in 10 years.

Negative No. 10: The Cougars have lost the first two games of the season 19 times. None of the previous 18 teams rebounded from an 0-2 start to finish with a winning record.

The latter fact is a cold splash of water in the face of Cougars everywhere. Not that WSU football fans have not grown accustomed to failure in recent years, but this year was supposed to be different. Way different.

Leach himself declared this to be his most talented team in Pullman. Senior quarterback Connor Halliday will leave Washington State with virtually every passing record in school history. WSU has one of the deepest and most talented groups of receivers in the nation.

Of course, everyone knew the inexperienced offensive line, secondary and kickers were questionable. All those units have been spotty, and Halliday – he of the huge heart but skinny body — has already taken some vicious hits. The experienced front seven has been outmuscled in both games.

If Halliday goes down, the Cougars could easily go 0-9 in the Pac-12. Even with Halliday, an 0-9 showing cannot be ruled out. The Pac-12 is that good. The Cougars might be that vulnerable.

The spotlight is squarely on Leach. He arrived in Pullman with unprecedented hype, but he has failed to live up to that hype. He says the Cougars lack a winning culture, but he is hardly the first coach to inherit such a malady. For $2.75 million a year, the Cougars expect a minor miracle or two.

 


YourThoughts

  • Will

    Maybe it’s time for the Cougs to leave the PAC-12 for a lesser conference …

    • RadioGuy

      I love the Cougs, but WSU is a Mountain West-level program trying to succeed in the PAC 12 and they’re simply outgunned. Bill Moos is trying to change that but without a Big Daddy like he had to pay the bills at Oregon, it’s like rowing a canoe up a waterfall.

      • Big

        Yep, Moos Bucks can’t compete with Phil Bucks. Leach and staff need to coach up the players and mend their psychic.

        Rolling in the sand pit. What football skill is being taught?

  • Buster Hyman

    Both the losses were surprising, but so is this article in hanging Leach after two games. Wulff was a horrible head coach I’ll stick with Leach.

  • jafabian

    Way too early to put Coach Leach on the hot seat. Can’t perform minor miracles when you’re using someone else’s players. By next season he’ll have his own players in place. He’s still going with Coach Wulff’s players right now.

    • MarkDuffman

      This is his third year so you’d think he would have had enough time to at least get SOME of his own players hitting their stride. Can’t go on blaming Wulff forever.

  • Jeff Shope

    Leach can’t spell run game or defense so don’t expect anything to change anytime soon.

  • MarkDuffman

    People fail to realize that Leach didn’t build Texas Tech into a winning program. They were already a winning program when he got there. All Leach did was dumb down their out of conference schedule so they had four automatic wins and voila he averaged a win or two more than their previous coach. When it came to conference games he was on par with the coach he followed. It was definitely a head scratcher for me to hear he was some incredible program builder when I looked and saw that he’s never built a program — just maintained what was already there. Seems like he’s doing the same thing here.