BY Art Thiel 07:01PM 11/16/2014

DEA checks Seahawks on pain-meds abuse

Agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration surprised NFL teams, including the Seahawks Sunday, with inspections of team records regarding use of pain medications.

The Drug Enforcement Agency is part of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Agents from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration conducted unannounced inspections Sunday around the NFL that included the Seahawks in Kansas City, according to the club. Agents were interviewing medical and training staffs of visiting teams, attempting to learn whether they violated federal drug laws governing the handling and distribution of prescription painkillers.

No arrests were made, according to DEA spokesperson Rusty Payne and reported by Associated Press and other news outlets. The Seahawks confirmed via Twitter and email that the club was “visited” in Kansas City, where they lost 24-20 Sunday, and flew back to Seattle.

“DEA agents are currently interviewing NFL team doctors in several locations as part of an ongoing investigation into potential violations of the (Controlled Substances Act),” Payne said.

Agents did not target specific teams, but were done to measure whether visiting NFL clubs were generally in compliance with federal law, AP reported. Agents requested documentation from visiting teams’ medical staffs for any controlled substances in their possession, and for proof that doctors could practice medicine in the home team’s state.

San Francisco 49ers personnel were checked after their win over the Giants at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, and personnel from Tampa Bay were interviewed at Baltimore-Washington International airport.

“What we were told was they are random checks of team physicians as they travel to see if anyone is transporting controlled substances across state lines,” 49ers spokesman Bob Lange said. “The 49ers medical staff complied and the team departed the stadium as scheduled.”

“Our teams cooperated with the DEA today and we have no information to indicate that irregularities were found,” NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in an email.

The investigation stems from a May lawsuit filed in federal court by attorneys for former NFL players who alleged the NFL and its teams, physicians and trainers acted without regard for players’ health, withholding information about injuries while handing out prescription painkillers such as Vicodin and Percocet, and anti-inflammatories such as Toradol, to mask pain and minimize lost playing time.

The players contend some teams filled out prescriptions in players’ names without their knowledge or consent, then dispensed those drugs — according to one plaintiff’s lawyer — “like candy at Halloween,” along with combining them in “cocktails.”

“This is an unprecedented raid on a professional sports league,” Steve Silverman, one of the attorneys for the former players, told AP. “I trust the evidence reviewed and validated leading up to this action was substantial and compelling.”

Federal prosecutors have conducted interviews in at least three cities over the past three weeks, spending two days in Los Angeles in late October meeting with a half-dozen former players. The meeting included at least two who were named plaintiffs in the painkillers lawsuit, according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the meetings who spoke on the condition of anonymity because prosecutors told them not to comment on the meetings.

Sunday’s inspections were administrative in nature, Payne said. They were not conducted with search warrants and no arrests were expected to be made.

According to a federal law enforcement source quoted anonymously by Outside the Lines, an ESPN news program, some NFL medical personnel were claimed to be handling controlled substances illegally.

“NFL doctors are not obtaining a separate registration where they are administering controlled substances to NFL players. They are administering in different states and treating players at hotels and stadiums outside of their registered location with the DEA,” the source told the program.

The DEA also has reason to believe visiting team physicians may not be keeping “readily retrievable documents” that spell out which prescription drugs are administered and to whom, the federal law enforcement source said.

“Our intelligence suggests controlled substances are not properly logged to specific players,” the source added.

The federal lawsuit, filed in the northern district of California, includes 10 named plaintiffs, including members of the celebrated 1985 Chicago Bears Super Bowl team, Jim McMahon, Richard Dent and Keith Van Horne, but could grow to include more than 1300 former players if the court eventually certifies the case as a class action,  said an attorney, Phil Closius, representing the players.


  • 1coolguy

    If ever there was a game where maybe they needed some drugs to forget, this one was it. Wow, the Hawks were in it till the end and had plenty of chances to win. It was remarkable to see very plainly just how valuable Unger is to their offensive scheme. Once he left the game, their offense simply drifted. They did not convert any of their 4th down opportunities and Wilson had even less time, if possible.
    Message to John and Pete: Get Unger signed up for the long term NOW, as you have witnessed life without him.

    • art thiel

      Unger’s value is large, and John and Pete know it better than any of us.

  • Jake Reeder

    I have a feeling that professional football as we know it quit simply isn’t possible without questionable use of opioid painkillers

    • art thiel

      This is about how they are used, by whom, when and where.

  • mtd9904

    So I guess they didn’t find anything. I’m sure the NFL teams didn’t get a tip or anything.

    • art thiel

      It’s not about finding drugs per se. It’s how they were ordered, recorded and distributed. Results remain to be seen.

  • Barry Morgan


  • eYeDEF

    It would be naive to think the DEA didn’t have a reason to target these three teams first would it not? Even if they claim it’s random and other teams would be checked soon, this sort of check would have already given an enormous heads up to other teams to get their practices into compliance. So there had to be be some suspicion that these three teams might have been more likely to not be in compliance? Any idea on if there are any recent Seahawks in a lawsuit?

    • art thiel

      Don’t know the name of the retired players who filed, but DEA wouldn’t go to this trouble if they didn’t have a reason. My guess, and it’s only a guess, is that visiting teams almost by definition have to cross state lines, which makes it federal jurisdiction, and interviewing staffers after games and before flights has the best chance of examining records, or lack thereof, of painkiller availability and distribution.

  • notaboomer

    Rusty Payne is an awesome name for a DEA spokesperson. I’m glad the war on nfl drugs has stepped up and conducted administrative reviews sans search warrant. This strategy is sure to smoke out heisenberg by the sooper bowl.

    • art thiel

      Lots of ways to go about this pursuit, and we bore public witness to just one.

      • notaboomer

        is it pursuit or just eyewash as in many previous nfl “scandals?”

        • art thiel

          How would any of us know? Once the feds declare themselves publicly on an investigation, it seems likely they have strong reasons, otherwise they end up looking foolish. Not saying they’re right or will win in court, but we wouldn’t know about this unless evidence seemed substantive.

  • Blue thunder

    I’m positive the DEA was likely checking out the players. Recently laws have been passed so that most states have a prescription monitoring program. That means prescriptions for opioids can be tracked to who prescribed them and who picked them up. The most likely scenario would involve a player getting multiple prescriptions from different doctors. Certain red flags go up if a doctor prescribes a large amount of meds. These doctors are talked to individually. They do not have direct access to dispense meds. That would be the pharmacists who would dispense. If there is question around the dispensing of meds with doctors and pharmacies the the pharmacies would be investigated. I think this all has something to do with the players.

    • art thiel

      The players are the ones who filed the suit whose allegations are being checked. The distribution by team-hired physicians and trainers is the question.

  • Jeff Shope

    DEA is nothing more than state sponsored drug dealers drug companies put out far more potent drugs than cartels do