BY Art Thiel 06:30AM 02/10/2017

Thiel: Pac-12 falling behind rivals in revenues

The conference TV deals scored by the SEC and the Big Ten continue to get better. Not so much for the Pac-12, where operating deficits are as common as complaints about the Pac-12 Networks.

Commissioner Larry Scott is stuck with the Pac-12 Conference falling behind in revenues. / Salt Lake Tribune

While Huskies fans were busy speculating on the football abilities of 17-year-old boys last week, some news came out of the Southeast that told a less-thrilling tale about Pac-12 Conference sports — if you care about the arms race that is slowly rotting big-time NCAA sports.

According to tax returns provided by the Southeastern Conference to USA Today, the SEC had revenues of $639 million for fiscal year 2016, from which it made a distribution of about $40 million for each of the 14 member schools.

By comparison, the Pac-12 in its most recent figures — they don’t release FY 2016 until May — distributed $25.1 million to its 12 members, according to reporting by Jon Wilner of the Mercury News.  The Big Ten was distributing $32.4 million to its 14 schools in the same period.

The primary cause of the disparity was TV revenues. As you may have read over the past five years of reporting on TV channels created by the Power 5 conferences, the Pac-12’s decision to own and control its propaganda arm, the Pac-12 Networks, rather ceding ownership to ESPN and Fox Sports, as the SEC and Big Ten have done, has not worked out well.

Defensively, the Pac-12 office says its arrangement is providing the schools benefits, such as recruiting exposure, that don’t show up on the spreadsheets. Network president Lydia Murphy-Stephans said revenue comparisons are misleading.

“We’re seven networks,” she told the San Fransisco Chronicle. “We’re managing athletic (websites) for the schools. We’re producing content for each of the universities. We’re owned by the universities. We’re an extension of the conference and the universities.

“We’re providing a lot of media support that the other schools aren’t getting from their media companies. We’re the only conference to partner with Twitter for our broadband service live stream.”

That is probably true. And it is exactly the reason revenues aren’t prospering. Since inception, the Pac-12’s failure to get satellite provider DirecTV to carry the channel has been a Hindenburg-class mistake.

Because the Pac-12 includes six geographically large, less densely populated states, satellite delivery is much more successful than terrestrial cable. You try getting a cable truck to East Bugthorpe, Utah.

The reason DirecTV keeps saying no on behalf of its 22 million subscribers is simple, according to a source familiar with the staunch refusal to pay carriage fees the Pac-12 Nets scored from cable systems when they thought Pac-12 content was attractive to large numbers of sports consumers.

“Most of it is a big infomercial for the conference,” he said.  “Aside from football games and a few men’s basketball games, the content isn’t worth it.”

Murphy-Stephans’ remarks seem to make that very point. Pac-12 Networks covered more than 850 events in 2016, but the audience for the non-revenue sports of baseball, softball, volleyball, etc., is confined largely to potential recruits, current athletes and members of their families.

So unless the Pac-12 lowers its price to DirecTV, distribution is stuck. And if the conference did lower its charge, the cable companies would demand make-good deals to match.

The Pac-12 is reaching 15 million homes, compared to the 60 million reached by the SEC Network as well as the Big Ten. The Pac-12 audience isn’t likely to grow a lot, simply because of the numbers of consumers cutting the cord and switching to either satellite or streaming. (But P12Nets is still capable of dictating game starting times, and withholding that info to as late as six days before kickoff.)

The seven channels of the Pac-12 Networks (independent of the revenues from ESPN and Fox) paid each school $1.5 million in 2015, and Wilner forecasted a bump to about $2 million in 2016. The numbers are well short of what was anticipated.

“We were hoping for $5 million to $6 million when we were launching,” Washington State athletic director Bill Moos told the Chronicle. “There was never a guarantee, but we were optimistic because we owned it outright.”

WSU’s athletic department reported a deficit of $13 million in each of 2014 and 2015. Washington reported a $14.8 million deficit for 2015. Other Pac-12 schools are also running deficits.

Fans who care only about their schools’ game outcomes are missing a point. When Washington considers the basketball coaching fate of Lorenzo Romar, whose team is about to miss the NCAA tourney field for the sixth consecutive season, it must consider that the buyout in his contract, which runs through 2020, is $3.2 million after this season.

While it’s true that UW athletics has a reserve fund that was up to $30 million at one point, it’s also true that the increased cost of providing scholarship athletes the full cost of attendance, as well as continuing legal setbacks for the NCAA in student-rights litigation, means that giving a coach $3.2 million out of the reserve fund to go away is a serious matter.

Especially when football coach Chris Petersen is likely in line for a contract extension and raise after his team reached the College Football Playoffs in his third season.

If the expectation now is to go into gunfights regularly with the likes of with SEC powers such as Alabama, Petersen is going to request his bosses provide him with more than a knife.

At some point the Pac-12 is going to have to realize the way it has done its TV business isn’t working, or risk falling back among the have-nots in the ruthless industry of big-time college sports.


  • 3 Lions

    Amazing these programs are running at a deficit for what fans pay in donations, ticket prices, cable rates & revenue the colleges receive from the networks. The Big Ten and SEC seem to have it figured out but not the Pac 12.

    • Effzee

      Part of the problem is that we here on the West Coast actually have things to do with our time that aren’t obsessing about ultimately meaningless distractions like sports being played teenagers.

      • art thiel

        To which Alabama backers respond: “Scoreboard, baby.” (To quote an infamous Huskies coach.)

        • Pixdawg13

          I thought that was the line used by Clemson fans these past few weeks…

    • art thiel

      The Pac-12 invested heavily in facilities upgrades before they knew the rev stream from their TV channels. Econ 101 will tell you that’s bad bidness.

  • Effzee

    “While Huskies fans were busy speculating on the football abilities of 17-year-old boys last week…” Well that’s a troubling way to put it. I’ve often thought that myself. What’s with these grown men who obsessively follow the physical development of teenaged boys? Sandusky much? :

    • art thiel

      Not ready to go there, but I will admit to being creeped out by the whole recruiting process, especially by those outside football programs.

      • I was paid 104000 bucks in 2016 by working from my house a­n­d I did that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part-time for few h /day. I used a business opportunity I found online and I am so excited that i was able to make so much extra income. It’s really beginner friendly and I’m so thankful that i found this. Here’s what I did…

  • Illuminati Doomsday

    Pac-12 network is mismanaged. It is still not picked up by Direct TV. Direct TV stating that the fees are “not worth it.” I get it on Comcast and like too much of the left coast it is politically correct. That is, a conscience decision has been made to try to showcase women’s sports equally with men’s. Fine. Then don’t expect to make money with it. Call it a non-profit. They need to set their priorities to make money if that is what they need. Run infomercials, reality shows, reruns of Andy Griffith if it makes them money.

    On Comcast, they recently switched Pac-12 Washington to standard definition TV. They have yesterdays technology at tomorrows prices. The generic Pac-12 network is still in HD, though.

    • art thiel

      As I pointed out, the schools are using it as a recruiting tool rather than a profit center. As you point out, to make money, they need more content, like Seinfeld reruns.

      Indeed, they need to make up their minds.

      • I’ve profited $104000 last year by freelancing from home a­n­d I did it by w­orking part-time for 3+ hrs a day. I was following a business opportunity I found online and I am so amazed that i made so much money on the side. It’s so newbie friendly a­­n­­d I’m so thankful that i learned about it. This is what i do…

    • Karenrkowalski

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj127d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash127HomeSourceGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj127d:….,………

    • Juliejschumacher

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj187d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash187HomeMarketGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj187d:….,….

    • Pixdawg13

      Are you The Donald? Let’s see. Pac-12 WA has always been standard def on Comcast; what they did do within the last year is put Pac-12 WA on a higher tier than the national Pac-12 Network channel, which is Hi-Def and has always been.

      Your claim of ‘politically correct’ is bushwah.

      Most damning of all: the word is “conscious” not “conscience”. Twit.

      • I have earned 104,000 thousand dollars in last 12 months by doing an on-line job at home and I did that by w­orking part time f­o­r 3+ hours every day. I’m using an earning opportunity I was introduced by this web-site i found on-line and I am so amazed that i was able to make such great money. It’s so user friendly and I’m just so happy that i discovered it. Here’s what I do…


    I’ve earned 104000 dollars previous year by doing an on-line job at my house and I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r few hrs daily. I’m using a money making model I came across from company that i found online and I am so amazed that i was able to make so much money on the side. It’s user friendly and I’m so blessed that i found it. Here’s what I do…